browningtons:

Legends of Equestria is really getting violent.

diabolicalcubussisters:

well then WHAT is the point

diabolicalcubussisters:

well then WHAT is the point

paleosteno:

New vlog out!

This time about The Equestranauts episode of Bob’s Burgers!

Please remember to like and share the video! :D

REBLOGS are appreciated!

hirosashii:

This is still one of my favorite videos on the internet

amazingatheist:

10 BIG Misconceptions About Atheism!

If you repeatedly criticize someone for liking something you don’t, they won’t stop liking it. They’ll stop liking you.
(via lasecondevie)

askthejan:

New possible Janthem.
The guys following my streams know what I’m talking about.

askflufflepuff:

3d poofy horse in 3d horse game.
http://www.legendsofequestria.com/

Fluffle Puff has been honored to become a unique character in the game Legends of Equestria.
She’ll be roaming around along side of everyone and living her dream of screaming at horses.
Or just getting attacked by bees.

And in case you have no idea what I’m talking about, the game is called Legends of Equestria and it’s basically a MLP MMO RPG.
You get to create a custom pony and literally roam around Equestria.
I’m not very fond of giving shout outs, but it’s one of the neatest and most complex fanmade project I’ve come across. And they’re actually on track and making progress.
If you’re a fan of colorful horses it might be worth at least checking out.
All the details on the game are on their site.
http://www.legendsofequestria.com/

stoppity:

Just a reference sheet for my followers. Seen a lot of people throwing around ‘Feminism’ as encompassing the ideals of all the movements, when that is in fact not the case. Modern feminism =/= Civil Rights feminism =/= Suffrage feminism.

stoppity:

Just a reference sheet for my followers. Seen a lot of people throwing around ‘Feminism’ as encompassing the ideals of all the movements, when that is in fact not the case. Modern feminism =/= Civil Rights feminism =/= Suffrage feminism.

thepeoplesrecord:

The 1% wants to ban sleeping in cars - it hurts their ‘quality of life’
April 16, 2014

Across the United States, many local governments are responding to skyrocketing levels of inequality and the now decades-long crisis of homelessness among the very poor … by passing laws making it a crime to sleep in a parked car.

This happened most recently in Palo Alto, in California’s Silicon Valley, where new billionaires are seemingly minted every month – and where 92% of homeless people lack shelter of any kind. Dozens of cities have passed similar anti-homeless laws. The largest of them is Los Angeles, the longtime unofficial “homeless capital of America”, where lawyers are currently defending a similar vehicle-sleeping law before a skeptical federal appellate court. Laws against sleeping on sidewalks or in cars are called “quality of life” laws. But they certainly don’t protect the quality of life of the poor.

To be sure, people living in cars cannot be the best neighbors. Some people are able to acquire old and ugly – but still functioning – recreational vehicles with bathrooms; others do the best they can. These same cities have resisted efforts to provide more public toilet facilities, often on the grounds that this will make their city a “magnet” for homeless people from other cities. As a result, anti-homeless ordinances often spread to adjacent cities, leaving entire regions without public facilities of any kind.

Their hope, of course, is that homeless people will go elsewhere, despite the fact that the great majority of homeless people are trying to survive in the same communities in which they were last housed – and where they still maintain connections. Americans sleeping in their own cars literally have nowhere to go.

Indeed, nearly all homelessness in the US begins with a loss of income and an eviction for nonpayment of rent – a rent set entirely by market forces. The waiting lists are years long for the tiny fraction of housing with government subsidies. And rents have risen dramatically in the past two years, in part because long-time tenants must now compete with the millions of former homeowners who lost their homes in the Great Recession.

The paths from eviction to homelessness follow familiar patterns. For the completely destitute without family or friends able to help, that path leads more or less directly to the streets. For those slightly better off, unemployment and the exhaustion of meager savings – along with the good graces of family and friends – eventually leaves people with only two alternatives: a shelter cot or their old automobile.

However, in places like Los Angeles, the shelters are pretty much always full. Between 2011 and 2013, the number of unsheltered homeless people increased by 67%. In Palo Alto last year, there were 12 shelter beds for 157 homeless individuals. Homeless people in these cities do have choices: they can choose to sleep in a doorway, on a sidewalk, in a park, under a bridge or overpass, or – if they are relatively lucky – in a car. But these cities have ordinances that make all of those choices a criminal offense. The car is the best of bad options, now common enough that local bureaucrats have devised a new, if oxymoronic, term – the “vehicularly housed”.

People sleeping in cars try to find legal, nighttime parking places, where they will be less apparent and arouse the least hostility. But cities like Palo Alto and Los Angeles often forbid parking between 2am and 5am in commercial areas, where police write expensive tickets and arrest and impound the vehicles of repeat offenders. That leaves residential areas, where overnight street parking cannot, as a practical matter, be prohibited.

One finds the “vehicularly housed” in virtually every neighborhood, including my own. But the animus that drives anti-homeless laws seems to be greatest in the wealthiest cities, like Palo Alto, which has probably spawned more per-capita fortunes than any city on Earth, and in the more recently gentrified areas like Los Angeles’ Venice. These places are ruled by majorities of “liberals” who decry, with increasing fervor, the rapid rise in economic inequality. Nationally, 90% of Democrats (and 45% of Republicans) believe the government should act to reduce the rich-poor gap.

It is easy to be opposed to inequality in the abstract. So why are Los Angeles and Palo Alto spending virtually none of their budgets on efforts to provide housing for the very poor and homeless? When the most obvious evidence of inequality parks on their street, it appears, even liberals would rather just call the police. The word from the car: if you’re not going to do anything to help, please don’t make things worse.

Source

Wow those 1% people are the biggest assholes imaginable.

adambawany:

spinning silhouette illusion: the dancer goes clockwise & counter-clockwise depending on how you look at it-
this is blowing my mind 

I showed this to one of my friends and he got scared. :P

adambawany:

spinning silhouette illusion: the dancer goes clockwise & counter-clockwise depending on how you look at it-

this is blowing my mind 

I showed this to one of my friends and he got scared. :P

iheartchaos:

Optical illusion of the day: Put cover the center of the gif with your fist to speed the stars up

iheartchaos:

Optical illusion of the day: Put cover the center of the gif with your fist to speed the stars up

theman5th:

ifyoucarryonthisway:

Do boys even get crushes on girls do boys even like girls do boys even feel things 

As a guy, the girls are the ones who never seem to like anyone

True dat

lady-socrates:

alongcameatom:

daintylolihime:

don’t insult your kids, it’s damaging and ruins their self esteem

don’t insult your kids, it’s damaging and ruins their self esteem

don’t insult your kids, it’s damaging and ruins their self esteem and makes you a shitty person

lets be honest here how many parents do you think are on tumblr? 

the question is: 

how many FUTURE parents are on tumblr? At least some, and then it matters